Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
BAG, J. basic appl. genet. (Online) ; 33(2): 45-53, Dec. 2022. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420296

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La displasia de cadera canina o displasia coxo-femoral (DCF) es un desorden progresivo e incapacitante en perros de razas grandes, como el Ovejero Alemán. La selección de reproductores libres de displasia es la única forma de reducir su incidencia. Se han desarrollado varios métodos de diagnóstico basados en el examen radiográfico, en base a los cuales se seleccionan los reproductores para la cría. La DCF tiene una base hereditaria poligénica e influencia ambiental, con una heredabilidad media a baja (alrededor de 0,20 a 0,40), por lo que el progreso de la selección fenotípica ha sido lento. En Argentina la prevalencia de la displasia en la raza sigue siendo alta (>25%) y es imposible prever su incidencia en la progenie del plantel de cría. Algunos países han implementado la selección basada en el valor estimado de cría, obteniendo un importante avance. Los estudios de asociación del genoma completo han revelado numerosos marcadores asociados a la DCF y se han encontrado varios genes candidatos que señalan la posibilidad de implementar una selección genómica en un futuro cercano.


ABSTRACT Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) is a progressive and disabling disorder in large dog breeds, such as the German Shepherd dog. Breeding sires and dams free of dysplasia is the only way to reduce its incidence. Several diagnostic methods have been developed based on radiographic examination, on the basis of which dogs are selected for breeding. CHD has a polygenic hereditary basis and environmental influence, with a median to low heritability (ca. 0,20 to 0,40), so the progress in phenotypic selection has been slow. In Argentina, the prevalence of dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs remains high (> 25%) and it is impossible to predict its incidence in the offspring of the breeding stock. Some countries have implemented a selection based on the estimated breeding value, obtaining an important advance. Genomewide association studies have revealed numerous CHD-associated markers and several candidate genes have been found that point to the possibility of implementing genomic selection in the near future.

2.
Rev. MVZ Córdoba ; 25(1): 51-58, ene.-abr. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1279654

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivo. Estimar parámetros genéticos para peso a los ocho meses de edad (W8M), edad al primer parto (AFC) y primer intervalo entre partos (FCI) usando parentesco genómico y por pedigrí. Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 481, 3063 y 1098 registros fenotípicos para W8M, AFC y FCI, respectivamente. La información genómica estuvo compuesta por una población de 718 animales genotipados con un chip que incluyó 30106 marcadores genéticos tipo polimorfismo de nucleótido simple (SNP). Modelos univariado y bivariado fueron construidos bajo la metodología del mejor predictor lineal insesgado convencional (BLUP) y genómico en una etapa (ssGBLUP). Resultados. Las heredabilidades para W8M, AFC y FCI variaron desde 0.25 a 0.26, 0.20 a 0.22 y 0.04 a 0.08, respectivamente. Los modelos de AFC y FCI con la metodología ssGBLUP disminuyeron ligeramente el error y aumentaron la varianza genética aditiva, respectivamente. Conclusiones. La inclusión de información genómica mejora levemente la precisión de las estimaciones genéticas en esta población. Sin embargo, una población de animales genotipados más grande y con mayor conectividad genética por parentesco permitiría aumentar para los criadores el potencial de la metodología ssGBLUP en ganado Simmental de Colombia.


ABSTRACT Objective. To estimate genetic parameters for weight at eight months of age (W8M), age at first calving (AFC) and first calving interval (FCI) using pedigree and genomic relationship. Materials and methods. Phenotypic data on 481, 3063 and 1098 animals for W8M, AFC and FCI were used, respectively. The genomic information came from a population of 718 genotyped animals with a density chip of 30,106 single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNP). Univariate and bivariate models were used under the conventional (BLUP) and single step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (ssGBLUP) methodologies. Results. The heritabilities for W8M, AFC and FCI ranged from 0.25 to 0.26, from 0.20 to 0.22 and from 0.04 to 0.08, respectively. The AFC and FCI models under ssGBLUP slightly decreased the error and increased the additive genetic variance, respectively. Conclusions. The inclusion of genomic information slightly increases the accuracy of the genetic estimates in this population. However, a larger amount of genotyped animals and with a higher genetic relationship connectivity would allow breeders to increase the potential of the ssGBLUP methodology in Colombian Simmental cattle.


Subject(s)
Animals , Livestock , Reproduction , Genomics
3.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec. (Online) ; 72(1): 33-39, Jan.-Feb. 2020. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1088915

ABSTRACT

A biópsia embrionária associada à genotipagem permite a obtenção de informações genômicas antes mesmo da transferência dos embriões. Neste estudo, foram avaliadas amostras biopsiadas de blastocistos bovinos transferidos para receptoras (n=47), sob a hipótese de que a raça (Gir ou Girolando), o estádio embrionário (blastocisto ou blastocisto expandido) e a competência para estabelecimento de prenhez (positiva ou negativa) afetariam a quantidade e a qualidade do DNA da amostra obtida. O DNA foi extraído, amplificado, quantificado por eletroferograma e genotipado. O parâmetro call rate (CR) foi adotado para mensurar a qualidade da genotipagem. Obteve-se concentração de DNA de 86,07±171,66ng/µL e CR 0,73±0,17. O CR não variou em função da quantidade de DNA nas amostras. As variáveis raça e estádio embrionário não influenciaram a concentração de DNA, nem o CR. Houve efeito da prenhez sobre o CR (P=0,0187), mas, como houve maior CR nas amostras provenientes do grupo prenhez negativa, não foi possível associar esse parâmetro à qualidade embrionária. Concluiu-se que a raça e a qualidade embrionária não afetam os parâmetros aqui estudados em amostras embrionárias, ou seja, embriões com maiores chances de implantação não refletem alta qualidade nas amostras de biópsia genotipadas.(AU)


Embryo biopsy associated with genotyping allows genomic information before embryo transfer. In this study, blastocyst biopsy samples from embryos transferred to recipients (n= 47) were evaluated, under the hypothesis that breed (Gyr or Girolando), embryonic stage (blastocyst or expanded blastocyst) and competence to establish pregnancy (positive or negative) would affect the quantity and DNA quality of samples. DNA was extracted, amplified, quantified by electropherogram and genotyped. The parameter call rate (CR) was used to measure the quality of genotyping. DNA concentration of 86.07±171.66ng/µl, and CR 0.73±0.17 was obtained. CR did not vary according to the amount of DNA in the samples. The variables breed and embryonic stage had no influence on DNA concentration or CR. There was pregnancy effect on the CR (P= 0.0187), but since there was a higher CR in the samples from the negative pregnancy group, it was not possible to associate this parameter with the embryonic quality. We conclude that the breed and embryo quality do not affect the evaluated parameters in embryonic samples. Embryos with higher chances of implantation do not reflect high quality in embryo biopsy genotyped samples.(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Selection, Genetic , Biopsy/veterinary , Sequence Analysis, DNA/veterinary , Embryo, Mammalian , Genotyping Techniques/veterinary , In Vitro Techniques/veterinary
4.
Rev. peru. biol. (Impr.) ; 27(1): 15-20, ene.-mar 2020.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144925

ABSTRACT

Abstract Developing countries have the challenge of achieving food security in a world context that is affected by climate change and global population growth. Molecular Genetics and genomics are proposed as technologies that will help to achieve sustainable food security. Technologies that have been developed in the last decade such as the development of genetic markers, genetic maps, genomic selection, next-generation sequencing, and DNA editing systems are discussed. Examples of some discoveries and achievements are provided.


Resumen Los países en vías de desarrollo tienen el reto de alcanzar seguridad alimentaria en un contexto mundial afectado por el cambio climático y crecimiento poblacional global. La genética molecular y la genómica son propuestas como tecnologías que ayudarán a alzanzar una seguridad alimentaria sostenible. Tecnologías que han sido desarrolladas en la última década como el desarrollo de marcadores moleculares, mapeo genético, selección genómica, secuenciamiento de próxima generación y sistemas de edición de ADN son discutidos. Se proveen ejemplos de algunos descubrimientos y logros.

6.
Rev. MVZ Córdoba ; 24(2): 7248-7255, mayo-ago. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1115246

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la precisión y el sesgo de predicción de valores genómicos directos (VGD) usando genotipos imputados a densidad media, en características productivas y reproductivas en ganado Holstein de Antioquia, Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Fueron genotipificados 31 animales con el chip Illumina BovineLD, 64 con el chip Illumina BovineSNP50v2 y 48 con el chip Illumina BovineHD. La imputación se realizó usando dos paneles de SNPs (6K y 40K) a una densidad 44K, usando el programa FINDHAP.f90 v4. Los efectos de los SNPs fueron estimados mediante el método bayes C, usando genotipos de baja densidad (6K) y genotipos imputados a una densidad media (44_imputado). La precisión y el sesgo de los VGDs fueron determinados mediante validación cruzada. Las características evaluadas fueron: producción de leche (PL), porcentaje de proteína (PRO), porcentaje de grasa (GRA), puntaje de células somáticas (SCS), intervalo entre partos (IEP) y días abiertos (DA). Resultados. Las precisiones de VGD (rpVGD.EBV) en todas las características evaluadas oscilaron entre 0.19 y 0.24 y el sesgo (bVGD.EBV) entre 0.03 y 0.16 cuando se usó el panel 6K y usando el panel 44K_imputado las precisiones fueron mayores, oscilado entre 0.24 y 0.33 y sesgo entre 0.03 y 0.26. Conclusiones. La precisión de predicción de los VGDs fue mayor cuando se usaron genotipos imputados a densidad media, en comparación con la precisión de predicción obtenida empleando genotipos de baja densidad. Por lo cual, en este estudio se concluye que la imputación de genotipos es muy útil dado que aumenta la confiabilidad de la evaluación genómica.


ABSTRACT Objective. The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and bias of direct genomic values (DGV) using imputed genotypes at medium density in yield- and reproduction-related traits for Holstein cattle from Antioquia, Colombia. Materials and Methods. A total of 31 animals were genotyped with the Illumina BovineLD chip, 64 with Illumina BovineSNP50v2 and 48 with Illumina BovineHD. Two SNP panels (6K and 40K) were imputed to a density of 44K using the FINDHAP.f90 v4 program. The effects of the SNPs were estimated using the Bayes C method, using low-density (6K) genotypes as well as medium-density imputed genotypes (44_imputed). The accuracy and bias of the DGVs were determined by cross-validation. The evaluated traits were: milk yield (MY), percentage of protein (PP), percentage of fat (PF), somatic cell score (SCS), calving interval (CI) and open days (OD). Results. When using the 6K panel, the accuracy values for DGV (rpDGV.EBV) in all the studied traits ranged from 0.19 to 0.24, and the bias (bDGV.EBV) from 0.03 to 0.16. In contrast, using the 44K_imputed panel generated higher accuracy values ranging from 0.24 to 0.33 and a bias ranging from 0.03 to 0.26. Conclusions. The accuracy of prediction the DGV was higher with genotypes imputed to medium densities when compared to the accuracy of prediction obtained using low-density genotypes. Therefore, in this study it is concluded that the imputation of genotypes is very useful, because it improves the reliability of the genomic evaluation.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Cattle , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Genomics , Genotype
7.
Rev. med. vet. zoot ; 66(2): 131-140, mayo-ago. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058577

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar parámetros genéticos con y sin la inclusión de parentesco genómico para la producción de leche acumulada a 60 (PL60), 150 (PL150), 210 (PL210) y 305 días (PL305) en ganado Simmental en Colombia. Un total de 2883 controles lecheros en 620 vacas de primer parto fueron utilizados. La información genómica se obtuvo a partir de 718 animales genotipados con un chip de una densidad de 30106 marcadores genéticos tipo polimorfismo de nucleótido simple (SNP). Se construyeron modelos de tipo univariado y bivariado bajo la metodología del mejor predictor lineal insesgado (BLUP) y genómico en una etapa (ssGBLUP). Los valores de heredabilidades para PL60, PL150, PL210 y PL305 variaron entre 0,20 a 0,27; 0,25 a 052; 0,30 a 0,35 y 0,20 a 0,23; respectivamente. La inclusión de parentesco genómico no aumentó las heredabilidades y tampoco la precisión de las estimaciones para las características asociadas a producción de leche. La escasez de información fenotípica y la baja conectividad genética entre la población genotipada y no genotipada podrían limitar procesos de selección genética para producción de leche a través del ssGBLUP en la población de ganado Simmental de Colombia.


ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to estimate genetic parameters with and without the inclusion of genomic relationship in cumulative milk production of Simmental cattle in Colombia for 60 (MP60), 150 (MP150), 210 (MP210) and 305 (MP305) days. A total of 2883 test records from 620 cows in first lactation were used. The genomic information was obtained from 718 animals genotyped with a commercial chip with a density of 30,106 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genetic markers. Univariate and bivariate models were used under the conventional best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) and the single step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) methodologies. The heritability estimate values for MP60, MP150, MP210 and MP305 ranged from 0.20 to 0.27, 0.25 to 0.52, 0.30 to 0.35 and 0.20 to 0.23, respectively. The use of the genomic relationship did not increase heritabilities nor the accuracy of estimates for milk traits. The lack of phenotypic records and the low genetic connectivity between genotyped and non-genotyped populations could limit the genetic selection procedures for milk production via the ssGBLUP in Colombian Simmental cattle.

8.
Rev. MVZ Córdoba ; 20(3): 4739-4753, Sept.-Dec. 2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: lil-769237

ABSTRACT

Objective. To estimate and compare breeding values (EBV) using the conventional method (BLUP) and genomic breeding values (MEBV and GEBV) estimated through bayes C method for milk yield and milk quality traits in dairy cattle in Antioquia, Colombia. Materials and methods. Two methods were used to estimate breeding values: BLUP to estimate conventional breeding value (EBV) and bayes C to estimate genomic values (MEBV and GEBV). The traits evaluated were: milk yield (PL), protein percentage (PPRO), fat percentage (PGRA) and score somatic cell (SCS). The methods (BLUP and bayes C) were compared using Person correlation (r p), Spearman rank correlation (r s) and linear regression coefficient (b). Results. The Pearson and Spearman correlations among EBVs and genomic values (MEBV and GEBV) (r pMEBV;EBV and r sGEBV;EBV) were greater than 0.93 and the linear regression coefficients of EBVs on genomic values (MEBV and GEBV) (bMEBV;EBV, and bGEBV;EBV) ranged between 0.954 and 1.051 in all traits evaluated. Conclusions. The predictions of genomic values (MEBV and GEBV), using bayes C method were consistent with the predictions of the EBVs estimate through the conventional method (BLUP) in conditions of high Colombian tropic, allowing to obtain high associations between the breeding values.


Objetivo. Estimar y comparar valores genéticos (EBV) usando el método convencional (BLUP) y valores genómicos (MEBV y GEBV) mediante el método bayes C en características de producción y calidad de la leche en ganado Holstein de Antioquia, Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Fueron empleados dos métodos para estimar valores genéticos: BLUP para estimar valores genéticos (EBV) y Bayes C para estimar valores genómicos (MEBV y GEBV). Las características evaluadas fueron: producción de leche (PL), porcentaje de proteína (PPRO), porcentaje de grasa (PGRA) y puntaje de células somáticas (SCS). Los métodos BLUP y bayes C fueron comparadas usando correlación de Pearson (r p), correlación por rangos de Spearman (r s) y regresión lineal (b). Resultados. Las correlaciones de Pearson y Spearman entre los EBVs y los valores genómicos (MEBV y GEBV) (r pMEBV;EBV y r sGEBV;EBV) fueron mayores de 0.93 y los coeficientes de regresión entre los EBVs y los valores genómicos (MEBV y GEBV) (bMEBV;EBV, y bGEBV;EBV) oscilaron entre 0.954 y 1.051 en todas las características evaluadas. Conclusiones. La predicción de valores genómicos (MEBV y GEBV) usando el método Bayes C fue consistente con los EBVs estimados mediante el método BLUP en condiciones del trópico alto colombiano, permitiendo obtener altas asociaciones entre los valores genéticos.


Subject(s)
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Genotype , Livestock
9.
Genomics & Informatics ; : 146-151, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-42759

ABSTRACT

Previous studies in Holstein have shown 35% to 51.8% heritability in milk production traits, such as milk yield, fat, and protein, using pedigree data. Other studies in complex human traits could be captured by common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and their genetic variations, attributed to chromosomes, are in proportion to their length. Using genome-wide estimation and partitioning approaches, we analyzed three quantitative Holstein traits relevant to milk production in Korean Holstein data harvested from 462 individuals genotyped for 54,609 SNPs. For all three traits (milk yield, fat, and protein), we estimated a nominally significant (p = 0.1) proportion of variance explained by all SNPs on the Illumina BovineSNP50 Beadchip (h(2)(G)). These common SNPs explained approximately most of the narrow-sense heritability. Longer genomic regions tended to provide more phenotypic variation information, with a correlation of 0.46~0.53 between the estimate of variance explained by individual chromosomes and their physical length. These results suggested that polygenicity was ubiquitous for Holstein milk production traits. These results will expand our knowledge on recent animal breeding, such as genomic selection in Holstein.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Breeding , Genetic Variation , Milk , Pedigree , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
10.
Rev. colomb. cienc. pecu ; 27(4): 306-314, oct.-dic. 2014. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-735090

ABSTRACT

Background: DNA markers have been widely used in genetic evaluation throughout the last decade due to the increased reliability of breeding values (BV) they allow, mainly in young animals. Objective: to compare breeding values estimated through the conventional method (best linear unbiased predictor, BLUP) with methods that include molecular markers for milk traits in Holstein cattle in Antioquia (Colombia). Methods: predictions of breeding values were performed using three methods: BLUP, molecular best linear unbiased predictor (MBLUP), and Bayes C. The breeding values were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficient and linear regression coefficient. Results: all Spearman correlation coefficients between breeding values obtained by different methods were greater than 0.5, while linear regression coefficients ranged between -2.10 and 1.58. Conclusions: prediction of breeding values through BLUP, MBLUP and Bayes C showed different results in terms of magnitude from the estimated values. However, animal ranking according to breeding values was not significantly different.


Antecedentes: en la última década, los marcadores de DNA han sido ampliamente usados en evaluaciones genéticas porque incrementan la confiabilidad de valores genéticos principalmente en animales jóvenes. Objetivo: comparar valores genéticos (BV) estimados por el método convencional (mejor estimador lineal insesgado, BLUP) y métodos que incluyen marcadores moleculares para algunas características lecheras en ganado Holstein de Antioquia (Colombia). Métodos: la predicción de valores genéticos se realizó mediante tres métodos: BLUP, mejor predictor lineal insesgado molecular (MBLUP) y Bayes C. Los valores genéticos fueron comparados usando el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman y el coeficiente de regresión lineal. Resultados: todos los coeficientes de correlación de Spearman entre los valores genéticos obtenidos por los diferentes métodos fueron mayores de 0,5. Mientras que los coeficientes de regresión lineal oscilaron entre -2,10 y 1,96. Conclusiones: la predicción de valores genéticos empleando los métodos BLUP, MBLUP y Bayes C fue diferente en términos de la magnitud de los valores estimados. Sin embargo el ranking o clasificación de los animales por sus valores genéticos no fue alterado significativamente.


Antecedentes: na última década, os marcadores moleculares que identificam polimorfismos no DNA têm sido utilizados amplamente nas avaliações genéticas porque aumentam a fiabilidade dos valores genéticos (BV) estimados principalmente em animais jovens. Objetivo: comparar valores genéticos estimados pelo método convencional (melhor preditor linear não-viesado, BLUP) e métodos que incluem marcadores moleculares para algumas características leiteiras no gado holandês de Antioquia (Colômbia). Métodos: as predições dos valores genéticos foram realizadas por meio de três métodos: BLUP, melhor preditor linear não-viesado molecular (MBLUP) e Bayes C. Os valores genéticos foram comparados por meio de coeficientes de correlação de Spearman e de coeficientes de regressão linear. Resultados: os coeficientes de correlação de Spearman entre os valores genéticos obtidos pelos diferentes métodos foram maiores que 0,5. Enquanto os coeficientes de regressão linear variaram entre -2,10 e 1,96. Conclusões: a predição dos valores genéticos usando os métodos BLUP, MBLUP e Bayes C foi diferente em quanto à magnitude dos valores estimados. No entanto, o ranking ou classificação de animais por seus valores genéticos não foi alterada significativamente.

11.
Ciênc. rural ; 43(9): 1642-1649, set. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-683165

ABSTRACT

A principal contribuição da genética molecular é a utilização direta das informações de DNA no processo de identificação de indivíduos geneticamente superiores. Sob esse enfoque, idealizou-se a seleção genômica ampla (Genome Wide Selection - GWS), a qual consiste na análise de marcadores SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) amplamente distribuídos no genoma. Devido a esse grande número de SNPs, geralmente maior que o número de indivíduos genotipados, e à alta colinearidade entre eles, métodos de redução de dimensionalidade são requeridos. Dentre estes, destaca-se o método de regressão via Quadrados Mínimos Parciais (Partial Least Squares - PLS), que além de solucionar tais problemas, permite uma abordagem multivariada, considerando múltiplos fenótipos. Diante do exposto, objetivou-se aplicar e comparar a regressão PLS univariada (UPLS) e multivariada (MPLS) na GWS para características de carcaça em uma população F2 de suínos Piau×Comercial. Os resultados evidenciaram a superioridade do método MPLS, uma vez que este proporcionou maiores valores de acurácia em relação à abordagem univariada.


The main contribution of molecular genetics is the direct use of DNA information to identify genetically superior individuals. Under this approach, genome-wide selection (GWS) can be used with this purpose. GWS consists in analyzing of a large number of SNP markers widely distributed in the genome, and due to the fact that the number of markers is much larger than the number of genotyped individuals and also to the fact that such markers are highly correlated special statistical methods, like Partial Least Squares (PLS), are widely required. Thus, the aim of this paper was to propose an application of Uni (UPLS) and Multivariate (MPLS) Partial Least Squares regression to GWS of carcass traits in an F2 (Piau × commercial) pig population. The results showed that MPLS method provided most accurate genomic breeding values estimates than univariate method.

12.
Genet. mol. biol ; 33(1): 198-204, 2010. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-566132

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare iterative and direct solvers for estimation of marker effects in genomic selection. One iterative and two direct methods were used: Gauss-Seidel with Residual Update, Cholesky Decomposition and Gentleman-Givens rotations. For resembling different scenarios with respect to number of markers and of genotyped animals, a simulated data set divided into 25 subsets was used. Number of markers ranged from 1,200 to 5,925 and number of animals ranged from 1,200 to 5,865. Methods were also applied to real data comprising 3081 individuals genotyped for 45181 SNPs. Results from simulated data showed that the iterative solver was substantially faster than direct methods for larger numbers of markers. Use of a direct solver may allow for computing (co)variances of SNP effects. When applied to real data, performance of the iterative method varied substantially, depending on the level of ill-conditioning of the coefficient matrix. From results with real data, Gentleman-Givens rotations would be the method of choice in this particular application as it provided an exact solution within a fairly reasonable time frame (less than two hours). It would indeed be the preferred method whenever computer resources allow its use.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL